another word for committed juvenile justice

Juvenile Justice TermsĪdjudicated: The court finds a youth guilty of committing a delinquent act. This glossary is designed to provide you with a better understanding of the Juvenile Justice System, and is not intended to be a substitute for the legal definition listed in CH 985.03, F.S.

Anyone working with juvenile offenders should visit this website.The juvenile justice system, statutes relevant to children's issues, and the budgetary process, use unique terminology not associated with the adult criminal justice system. This is the go to place for current information about juvenile justice issues.

Easy Access to Juvenile Court Statistics (EZAJCS) (2015).

Key Fact: Youth in the Justice System (2016).

Progress Check: Youth Confinement in America Today: Youth Residing In Juvenile Detention, Correctional And/Or Residential Facilities (2016).

Youth Residing in Juvenile Detention, Correctional and/or Residential Facilities by Race and Hispanic Origin (2017).

Youth Residing in Juvenile Detention, Correctional and/or Residential Facilities (2017).

Youth Confinement: The Whole Pie (2018).

Juveniles in Residential Placement, 2015 (2018).

Steep Drop Since 2000 in Number of Facilities Confining Juveniles (2018).

Easy Access to the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement (EZACJRP) (2019).

Youth Confinement: The Whole Pie (2019).

Easy Access to Juvenile Populations (EZAPOP) (2022).

Easy Access to State and County Juvenile Court Case Counts (EZACO).

Juvenile Justice GPS (Geography, Policy Practice & Statistics) is an online repository providing visitors with a sweeping view of the juvenile JJGPS tracks juvenile justice system reform. This is an excellent resource for individuals working with or concerned about justice-involved juveniles. Please visit our Desktop Guide to Quality Practice for Working with Youth in Confinement microsite to continue researching this topic. It is a constant challenge to remind this nation’s juvenile justice leaders and experts that a critical role for juvenile facilities is to address the needs of these youth. However, youth that remain in custody are not only the ones who present the greatest risk of violence, they are the youth with the most serious needs-those who require additional specialized resources and services. The “new normal” in juvenile justice now means that only those youth that pose the greatest threat to public safety should be in juvenile custody facilities.

Reform thinking includes policies and strategies based on improved screening instruments for purposes of diversion, community-based alternatives that emphasize the least intrusive placement of at-risk youth who require some form of limited supervision and care, and an expansion of community-based programs that meet the needs of at-risk youth. In addition to enlightened thinking, reforms have been motivated by the high costs and poor outcomes associated with the operations of youth facilities, especially those using an adult corrections model. We now must add adult facilities that are responsible for the care and custody of youthful offenders to this list of isolated elements. As history continues to show, juvenile detention and corrections remain the “forgotten” elements of the juvenile justice system. However, a secondary-and perhaps unintended-consequence has been a parallel reduction in the resources available to continue providing much needed training and technical assistance to facilities that still must confine the most troublesome youth. Recent successful juvenile justice and juvenile detention reforms have resulted in better and more meaningful public policy on the use of custody facilities and have triggered significant reductions in juvenile detention and corrections populations.

Another word for committed juvenile justice